Attribution Isn't Dead. You're Just Using It Wrong.

Buyers are researching anonymously, but that doesn’t mean attribution is irrelevant. It simply means you need to stop chasing precision and start seeing patterns.

Prefer to Listen? For those who prefer to consume information through audio, I’ve used Google’s NotebookLM to transform this newsletter into a short podcast episode, featuring a natural conversation between two AI hosts. You can listen to the podcast by pressing the play button below.

Disclaimer: This podcast was generated by AI based on this written newsletter content and reviewed by me to ensure ethical and responsible AI use. It’s designed to provide an efficient, more inclusive way to consume information.

—

Unpopular opinion: Attribution models aren’t obsolete. They’re evolving.

In a world where buyers ghost your funnel until they’re nearly ready to buy, attribution models can’t give you certainty, but they can still give you clarity. The trick? Stop expecting perfection, and start using attribution as a directional tool, not a definitive one.

What Is a Marketing Attribution Model?

A marketing attribution model is a framework used to understand which prospect or customer touchpoints have the greatest impact on conversion.

In theory, it helps answer: “Which of our marketing efforts are actually working?”

If a buyer accepts cookies or is part of your email list, your CRM and marketing automation platform can begin to piece together their activity across different channels. Viewed through an attribution lens, these data points help marketers decide where to invest: Should we double down on paid search? Shift budget into webinars? Cut our underperforming display ads?

Sounds great. But here’s the catch: attribution is not an exact science, and the more complex the buyer journey, the fuzzier the answers get.

The Two Core Attribution Models

Attribution models fall into two main categories: single-touch and multi-touch. Each has subtypes, and each works best depending on your business model, sales cycle, and data maturity.

Single-Touch Attribution

All credit goes to one touchpoint, typically either the first interaction (what brought them in) or the last (what closed the deal). These models are simple, but dangerously reductive.

First-Touch: Attributes 100% of the credit to the first touchpoint. Helpful for understanding awareness-driving channels, but ignores everything that happens later.

Last-Touch: Gives 100% of the credit to the final action before conversion. Useful in transactional sales, but wildly misleading in complex B2B cycles.

Why It’s Flawed: Imagine this journey: a prospect gets an email, sees your LinkedIn ad, checks out a G2 review, listens to your podcast, then clicks a retargeting ad with a promo code. In a last-touch model, that final ad gets all the credit, erasing everything that made the click possible.

Use with caution (or not at all) if your sales cycle has any level of complexity.

Multi-Touch Attribution

Multi-touch models assign credit across multiple touchpoints. They don’t solve every problem, but they reflect reality more closely than single-touch models.

Linear: Gives equal credit to every tracked interaction. Great for early-stage teams or when you want a broad view of buyer engagement. Doesn’t highlight what’s most impactful, but provides a balanced overview.

U-Shaped (Position-Based): Allocates 40% credit to the first and last touches, with 20% distributed across the middle interactions. Useful for highlighting key entry and exit points in the journey.

W-Shaped: Gives 30% credit each to three critical milestones—typically first touch, lead creation, and opportunity creation—with 10% shared across everything else. I see this one use most for structured B2B sales.

Time Decay: Increases credit for touchpoints closer to conversion. Prioritizes recency and momentum and is ideal if you’re trying to accelerate deals or shorten cycles.

Custom Models: Tailored to your organization’s buyer journey (in theory). In practice? They’re often built around how you wish buyers behaved, not how they actually do.

Algorithmic (Data-Driven): Uses machine learning to analyze historical conversion paths and assign credit. Vendors claim this is the most accurate model, and it can be. But it’s resource-intensive, hard to maintain, and unreliable without large, clean datasets.

The Big Problem: Attribution Misses the Most Important Touches

Today’s B2B buyers do up to 70% of their research anonymously, without ever filling out a form or talking to sales. They check peer reviews on G2. They ask for recommendations in Slack groups. They read LinkedIn posts, lurk on your podcast, or visit your website incognito. And they’re doing all of this before your CRM ever knows they exist.

That means attribution models are inherently flawed—not because they’re bad, but because they’re incomplete.

Buying isn’t cause and effect. It’s a mosaic of influence. Attribution models only capture the tiles you can see.

If you’re using attribution to make precise budget decisions or justify major program shifts, you’re operating on partial information, and that’s risky. What you can use attribution for is identifying consistent patterns across programs, channels, and content that correlate with engagement or pipeline acceleration.

So, What Should You Do?

Here’s the hard truth: no attribution model will show you the full picture. But that doesn’t mean you should ignore the data. It means you need to use it with discernment, layering it with other insights to make smarter, context-aware decisions.

1. Treat Attribution as a Compass, Not a GPS

Your attribution model won’t tell you why someone converted. It won’t account for the podcast episode they listened to while walking the dog, the Slack referral that led them to your site, or the LinkedIn post that softened them to your brand three weeks ago. But it can point you in the right direction:

• Are you seeing a spike in conversions from webinar attendees over time?

• Is there a consistent path from paid social to demo requests?

• Are buyers engaging more frequently after consuming analyst reports?

Use this directional insight to prioritize and test, not to cut entire programs based on a few last-touch wins.

Pro move: Run cohort analysis alongside attribution data to see how certain channel patterns correlate with deal velocity, average contract value, or expansion.

2. Align Attribution with Buying Behavior, Not Just Internal Stages

Many marketers force-fit attribution models into their sales process milestones. But your buyers don’t care about MQL → SAL → SQL. They care about solving their problem.

Make sure your model reflects how they move, not just how you want them to move. That means:

• Rethinking your “lead source” definitions

• Mapping real-world behaviors (like product page visits, trial starts, case study consumption) into your models

• Regularly validating your model with sales and CS feedback

Example: If your U-shaped model is weighting lead creation heavily, but the real momentum happens post-demo, you’re crediting the wrong part of the journey.

3. Don't Make Budget Decisions on Attribution Alone

Attribution data can support budget shifts, but it shouldn’t drive them. Too many CMOs make drastic reallocations based solely on what shows up in the dashboard.

Reality check:

• High-performing channels often depend on low-attribution awareness plays (e.g., content syndication feeding paid search intent)

• Just because something doesn’t show up in your model doesn’t mean it’s not working

Instead, pair attribution data with:

• Qualitative feedback from sales (what do they hear from prospects?)

• Engagement trends over time (which channels keep showing up in closed-won journeys?)

• Cost-to-impact ratios (what’s driving quality touches, not just volume?)

Audit tip: Before cutting spend, ask: What other programs feed this one? You may be about to dismantle the engine that makes your “top performer” look good.

4. Use Attribution to Ask Better Questions, Not Declare Answers

Shift your mindset. Attribution isn’t there to tell you what to do. It’s there to help you ask smarter questions, such as:

• What patterns are emerging in our most efficient deal paths?

• Are there under-the-radar content pieces that consistently appear in journeys?

• Why are certain channels showing higher contribution to expansion vs. net new?

When you use attribution as a conversation starter, not a decision-ender, you unlock its real value.

5. Build a Multi-Signal Attribution Framework

Think of attribution as one node in a network of marketing intelligence. Best-in-class teams combine:

• Self-reported attribution: Ask “How did you hear about us?” on every form. You’ll get insight into dark social, peer referrals, podcasts, and more.

• Win/loss interviews: These reveal the why behind the journey—and surface touchpoints no tool can track.

• Dark social listening: Use tools (or human analysis) to see where you’re being mentioned in Slack groups, Reddit threads, DMs, or community forums.

• First-party intent: Look at behaviors from known contacts across your ecosystem—web engagement, product usage, email interaction.

Synthesis tip: Develop a “growth insights dashboard” that includes attribution trends, qualitative buyer intel, sales feedback, and content consumption metrics.

Final Thought: Attribution Still Matters

Attribution models won't give you perfect visibility, but they can make you a sharper, more strategic marketer if you use them wisely. The key is knowing what they're good for: recognizing patterns, validating trends, and informing—not dictating—your next move. Stop chasing precision that doesn't exist. Instead, build a marketing engine that blends data, context, and curiosity.

Your job isn’t to explain every closed-won. It’s to build repeatable momentum.

So pick a model, know its limits, layer it with real-world insights, and get back to doing what marketing does best: driving growth.

Now go build smarter. And if your attribution model is driving the conversation instead of supporting it, it’s time to recalibrate.

If you’re new here, welcome. Growth, Accelerated is a weekly newsletter on go-to-market strategy, leadership, and the real work behind high-performing teams. If you found this useful, subscribe or forward it to someone who needs this reminder today.

Articles You May Have Missed